Common Questions for the Personal Project Report


What form or structure is the report expected to take? Does each section of the report correspond to an assessment criterion?
MYP projects criteria focus more on content than a prescribed format for reporting. However, the process of developing and reporting the project generally follows the pattern outlined by the project objectives: investigating, planning, action and reflection.
Many students will find it useful to organize their reports with four corresponding headings so that the report is presented in identifiable sections following the project objectives as required.
Supervisors and examiners generally look for evidence of achievement against relevant criteria in the corresponding section, but they are not limited to the identified section when making judgments.

Does “a variety of source types” mean students should limit the number of internet sources included, in favor of books, articles, interviews and other formats?
No. In some cases access to physical materials may be difficult for students. Students can include multiple sources from the internet, which should include a variety of formats and materials (for example: books, reports, archives, interviews, films, data sets, journals, infographics, articles and presentations). A range of sources can also encompass variety in origin, purpose, value and limitations (bias).

Is the product/outcome directly assessed by the student’s supervisor?
Yes, as part of criterion C, based on the quality of the product/outcome with respect to the student’s well-considered and appropriately challenging criteria for success. Evidence of the product/outcome must be provided along with the report (within submission limits).

Does the project report have to contain a bibliography (record of sources used in the report or used to complete the project)?
Yes. Students should use a standard format that represents the school’s ATL planning for research skills.

Do students have to include evidence of their completed product/outcome in material submitted for moderation?
Yes. It can be included as an additional appendix to the report or as a separate artifact.

Is it compulsory to submit the academic honesty form?
Yes. For MYP projects, students and their supervisors must use and complete the academic honesty form provided by the IB. This form provides a uniform way for students to record meetings with their supervisors (dates and points of discussion) as a way to document the academic integrity of longer-term, independent work. 

Do students need to achieve a grade 3 in the personal project to attain the IB MYP certificate?
Yes, without the passing score, no certificate will be awarded, even if all other requirements are met by the student.

Should students refer to the process journal in their reports?
Process journal extracts are considered when awarding achievement levels for the project. Each extract should be specifically referenced in the body of the report when cited as evidence for the development of ideas and skills. For example, when students discuss their planning and development of the project in the report, they can justify their discussion with evidence from the process journal extract chosen to include in the appendix. That evidence might include a copy of the timeline they developed as an entry in the process journal.

 How many extracts should be included in the project appendices?
In the personal project, students should select a maximum of 10 extracts to represent the key developments, with a maximum total of 10 A4 pages. In the community project, students choosing to work in groups will submit a maximum of 15 extracts per group, with a maximum of 15 A4 pages.

Who is responsible for selecting the process journal extracts?
Students are responsible for choosing appropriate extracts from the process journal and making them available to the supervisor as an appendix to the project report. The supervisor can guide students in their selection process.

Is the product/outcome directly assessed by the student’s supervisor?
Yes, as part of criterion C, based on the quality of the product/outcome with respect to the student’s well-considered and appropriately challenging criteria for success. Evidence of the product/outcome must be provided along with the report (within submission limits).

No comments:

Post a Comment